Cases 41 - 50 of 476
Smith v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv01554
Petitioner:
Brenda Ann Smith
Respondent:
Pullen and Warden Timethea Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Giovinco v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv01515
Petitioner:
Charles Anthony Giovinco
Respondent:
Timethea Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Zarzar v. Pullen
as 3:2023cv00028
Petitioner:
Shmuel Zarzar
Respondent:
Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Orndorff v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv01637
Petitioner:
Danielle Nicole Orndorff
Respondent:
Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Freeman v. Pullen et al
as 3:2022cv01567
Petitioner:
Carolyn Freeman
Respondent:
Timethea Pullen, Patrick McFarland, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cates et al v. Adamson et al
as 3:2022cv01401
Petitioner:
Timothy Cates, Dustin Monik, Howard Poole and others
Respondent:
R. Adamson, Robert T. Greene, Angela Dukate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Castillo v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv01470
Petitioner:
Higinio Castillo
Defendant:
T. Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lincoln v. Walraven et al
as 4:2022cv04107
Plaintiff:
Jessica Renee Lincoln
Defendant:
Sheriff Bobby Walraven, Gina Butler, Police Officer John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amato v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv01296
Petitioner:
Carlo Eugenio Amato
Respondent:
T. Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jackson v. Pullen
as 3:2022cv01542
Petitioner:
Keith Jackson
Respondent:
Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
