Cases 41 - 50 of 97
Thomas v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13616
Plaintiff:
Raymond Thomas
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., Volkswagen AG, Audi AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carroll v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as MIE/2:15-cv-13360
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carroll , Scott Xavier Brown , Hava Gurevich and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. , Volkswagen Manufacturing Corporation of America, Suburban Imports of Farmington Hills, Inc. and others
Donavan v. Dixon et al
as 1:2015cv02089
Plaintiff:
Laura Donavan
Defendant:
Tony L. Dixon and Raymond Thomas Allred
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Shiloh Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv07449
Plaintiff:
Raymond Thomas
Defendant:
Shiloh Industries, Inc. , Ramzi Hermiz and Thomas M. Dugan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Raymond Thomas Garcia, Jr. v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2015cv01406
Plaintiff:
Raymond Thomas Garcia, Jr.
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Kern Valley State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Tommie Thoma
as 15-7217
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TOMMIE RAYMOND THOMAS
Trevino v. Clark et al
as 3:2015cv01550
Plaintiff:
Atrayon David Trevino
Defendant:
Raymond Thomas Clark, Dynasty Capital Partners, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Phillips v. Clark et al
as 3:2015cv01387
Plaintiff:
Kevin John Phillips
Defendant:
Raymond Thomas Clark, Dynasty Capital Partners, Inc., RTC Capital, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
US v. Tommie Thoma
as 15-6888
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TOMMIE RAYMOND THOMAS
Thomas v. USA
as 3:2015cv00241
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Tommie Raymond Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
