Cases 41 - 50 of 97
Cooper v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as 1:2018cv10665
Plaintiff:
Rachel Luis Cooper
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Windham v. J.P. Morgan Chase, NA et al
as 1:2018cv10402
Plaintiff:
Rachel A. Windham
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase, NA and Harmon Law Offices
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Sellers et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp
as 1:2018cv10022
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Sellers and Rachel Sellers
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Padmanabhan, MD PhD v. Hulka et al
as 1:2017cv11939
Plaintiff:
Bharanidharan Padmanabhan, MD PhD
Defendant:
Carol Hulka, M.D., Rachel Nardin, M.D., James Paikos and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv11808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv11808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jean-Louis v. Mercer Transportation, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv11718
Plaintiff:
Rachelle Jean-Louis
Defendant:
Mercer Transportation, Inc. and Todd Springer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kurtz v. Kripalu Center for Yoga & Health, Inc.
as 3:2017cv30109
Plaintiff:
Rachel Kurtz
Defendant:
Kripalu Center for Yoga & Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Stryker LFIT V40 Femoral Head Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2017md02768
Defendant:
Stryker LFIT V40 Femoral Head Products Liability Litigation, Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Surgi-Care, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amy Saunders, Paul Loizzo, Betsy Perez and others
Interested Party:
Willard J. Moody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hannon v. Genereaux et al
as 4:2017cv40022
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Hannon
Defendant:
David Genereaux , James Smith , Justin Piccirillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
