Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Bagwell v. Richmond City Jail et al
as 1:2009cv00925
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Bagwell
Defendant:
Richmond City Jail, C. T. Woody and Cherly Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Richmond (City of) School Board Employer et al
as 3:2009cv00399
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Chambers
Defendant:
Richmond (City of) School Board Employer and Sedgwick Claims MGN. SERV. INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McCoy v. Robinson et al
as 3:2008cv00555
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. McCoy
Defendant:
Robinson and Richmond City Jail - Medical
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Meyers v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 3:2008cv00466
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Hunter Marshall, G. S. Witt and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Crosby v. Richmond City Police Officer Godwin
as 2:2008cv00171
Petitioner:
Michael F. Crosby
Respondent:
Richmond City Police Officer Godwin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dugas v. Hanover County Circuit Court et al
as 3:2008cv00072
Plaintiff:
Greg Lee Dugas
Defendant:
Hanover County Circuit Court and Richmond City Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Morrison v. Richmond City Jail et al
as 2:2008cv00098
Plaintiff:
Alvin D. Morrison
Defendant:
Richmond City Jail, Richmond Sheriffs Dept. and V.C.U. Police
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bellamy v. Chesapeake Correctional Center et al
as 3:2007cv00564
Plaintiff:
James Edward Bellamy, Jr.
Defendant:
Chesapeake Correctional Center and Richmond City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
