Cases 41 - 50 of 127
CITY OF FRANKLIN et al v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv03174
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, PURDUE PHARMA L.P., MALLINCKRODT LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TOWN OF PENDLETON, CITY OF FRANKLIN and CITY OF RICHMOND
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Richmond v. Warden
as 3:2018cv00286
Petitioner:
Isaiah Richmond
Respondent:
Warden
Miscellaneous_party:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murfitt v. Grzgorek et al
as 3:2018cv00237
Plaintiff:
Mark Stewart Murfitt
Defendant:
Michael D Grzgorek, Julie Lawson, S Richmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHMOND JR. v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv01042
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
WALTER G. RICHMOND JR.
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and SSA-USAO (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Johnson v. Decker et al
as 3:2018cv00026
Plaintiff:
Thomas B Johnson
Defendant:
Timothy P Decker, Julie Lawson and Steven Richmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. St Joseph County et al
as 3:2018cv00020
Plaintiff:
Tabais Davis
Defendant:
St Joseph County, St Joseph County Jail, Michael D Grzegorek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Schroeder et al
as 3:2017cv00945
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lamont Peterson, II
Defendant:
Belinda Schroeder and Steve Richmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02478
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Taghon v. Lawson et al
as 3:2017cv00508
Plaintiff:
Stephen Edward Taghon, Jr
Defendant:
Julie Lawson, S Richmond and Miss Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHMOND v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2017cv01923
Defendant:
DREW ADAMS, ROBERT CARTER, ERIC HOLCOMB and others
Plaintiff:
ANTWOIN RICHMOND
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437 Federal Election Commission
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
