Cases 41 - 50 of 18,452
Veitia v. Queen et al
as 8:2024cv01536
Plaintiff:
Angel Jose Rivera Veitia
Defendant:
Michael Anthony Queen and Partrans, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bautista Cayman Asset Company v. Centro Cardiovascular de Manati III, C.S.P., et al
as 24-1496
Plaintiff:
BAUTISTA CAYMAN ASSET COMPANY
Defendant:
CENTRO CARDIOVASCULAR DE MANATI III, C.S.P., JOSE RAMON MARTINEZ-BARROSO, VIRGEN MILAGROS RIVERA-COLON and others
Rivera v. TWO L & H, L.L.C.
as 0:2024cv60897
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rivera
Defendant:
TWO L & H, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rivera-Delgado et al v. Metro Pavia Hospital Group, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01235
Plaintiff:
Edmar Rivera-Delgado and Taymari Delgado-Echevarra
Defendant:
Companies/Entities X,Y, and Z, Metro Pavia Hospital Group, LLC, Insurance Companies D, E, F, and G and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
United States of America v. Clanton (James)
as 24-1428
Respondent:
MARY CLANTON, TONY CLANTON, JEAN MARTELLY and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellant:
MELVA JAMES
United States of America v. Clanton (Shahidah Clanton)
as 24-1429
Respondent:
MARY CLANTON, TONY CLANTON, JEAN MARTELLY and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellant:
SHAHIDAH CLANTON
United States of America v. Clanton (Mary Clanton)
as 24-1423
Respondent:
JAMILLAH RIVERA and TONY CLANTON
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellant:
MARY CLANTON, JEAN MARTELLY, MELVA JAMES and others
VEITIA v. QUEEN et al
as 8:2024cv01524
Plaintiff:
ANGEL JOSE RIVERA VEITIA
Defendant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY QUEEN and PARTRANS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
