Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops, LLC v. The Harger Company et al
as 4:2012cv00085
Plaintiff:
Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops, LLC
Defendant:
The Harger Company and Roberta Kay Harger
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Robbins et al v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00040
Plaintiff:
Jason S. Robbins and Tina M. Robbins
Defendant:
Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. , Johnson & Freedman, LLC , Nationwide Trustee Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. THE COUNTY OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, et al
as 1:2011cv01065
Plaintiff:
LINWOOD E. WILSON
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, MIKE RUFFIN, WORTH HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oakes v. Monroe et al
as 3:2011cv00595
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Oakes, Jr.
Defendant:
Rodney Monroe, Joan Hummel, Ricky Robbins and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. et al v. Robbins
as 2:2011cv00052
Plaintiff:
EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. , NagraStar LLC and Dish Network L.L.C.
Defendant:
Andy Robbins
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
The Gray Insurance Company et al v. D&G Contractors Southeast, Inc. et al
as 7:2011cv00215
Plaintiff:
The Gray Insurance Company and The Gray Casualty & Surety Company
Defendant:
D&G Contractors Southeast, Inc., G. Robbins Enterprises, Inc. and Gene A. Robbins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
ADAMS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv00512
Plaintiff:
ROBBIN ADAMS
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
ROBBINS v. USA
as 1:2011cv00394
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
TEON RAYNARD ROBBINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WILSON v. WILSON
as 1:2011cv00182
Plaintiff:
LINWOOD E. WILSON
Defendant:
BARBARA B. WILSON, ATWOOD F. BADMAN, JOAN L. BADMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
