Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Gssime v. Wasserman
as 11-948
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Said Gssime
Defendant - Appellee:
Beth Wasserman, Barbara Sulkis, Kathleen Rice and others
Nikoonahad v. G.C. Investments, LLC et al
as 5:2011cv01171
Plaintiff:
Mehrdad Nikoonahad
Defendant:
G.C. Investments, LLC , Third Point Partners, L.P. , Third Point Partners Qualified , L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv10350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv10350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Schwartz v. United States National Nuclear Security Administration et al
as 4:2011cv00149
Plaintiff:
Robert Schwartz
Defendant:
United States National Nuclear Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Daniel O'Connell, et al v. Jose Fernandez-Pol
as 10-17450
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DANIEL H. O'CONNELL, Trustee of Thomas J. O'Connell Irrevocable Trust; Trustee of Daniel H. O'Connell Irrevocable Trust, JOHN F. PATZMAN, PATZMAN FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, LLP and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE FERNANDEZ-POL, Dr.
Schwartz v. Ploughe
as 1:2010cv01589
Petitioner:
Robert Schwartz
Respondent:
Pamela Ploughe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cox et al v. Tintle
as 1:2010cv00729
Plaintiff:
Dewitt Cox , Frank Bisio , Robert Schuman and others
Defendant:
Jeremy Tintle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Nikoonahad v. Greenspun Corporation et al
as 5:2010cv01247
Plaintiff:
Mehrdad Nikoonahad
Defendant:
Greenspun Corporation , G.C. Investments, LLC , Third Point Partners LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
