Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Anthony v. Sillen
as 3:2008cv00187
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Anthony, Sr.
Defendant:
Robert Sillen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arron v. Sillen et al
as 5:2007cv06183
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Arron, Jr.
Respondent:
Robert Sillen and Federal Receiver California Prison Healthcare Receivership, Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Balbo v. Tilton et al
as 2:2007cv02283
Plaintiff:
John Michael Balbo
Defendant:
James Tilton, John Dovey and Robert Sillen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooperwood et al v. Tilton et al
as 5:2007cv05417
Plaintiff:
Michael Mutawally Cooperwood, Bambari S. Kelly Anderson, Nico Luciano Vasquez and others
Defendant:
Robert Tilton, Robert Sillen, Robert A. Horel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medical Development International v. Sillen et al
as 2:2007at00972
Defendant:
Robert Sillen and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Plaintiff:
Medical Development International
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Medical Development International v. Sillen et al
as 2:2007cv02199
Defendant:
Robert Sillen and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Plaintiff:
Medical Development International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Bergne v. United States District Court, Northern District of California et al
as 3:2007cv03413
Petitioner:
Peter M. Bergne
Respondent:
United States District Court, Northern District of California and Robert Sillen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Krenn v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2007cv02295
Plaintiff:
Esther Krenn
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Santa Clara Department of Correction (DOC), Santa Clara Valley Health and Hospital System (SCVHHS) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
