Cases 41 - 50 of 100
Johnson v. Humphrey et al
as 1:2018cv00043
Plaintiff:
Tyrone R. Johnson
Defendant:
Michael Humphrey, Ronald Erdos, Larry Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
M-Cor Steel, Inc. v. Rodgers
as 2:2017mc00035
Plaintiff:
M-Cor Steel, Inc.
Defendant:
William D. Rodgers
Urban et al v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission of the United States of America et al
as 5:2017cv01005
Plaintiff:
Laura D. Urban , Jonathan Strong , Constance Jane Carl and others
Defendant:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission of the United States of America , Cheryl A. LaFleur , Colette D. Honorable and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Vegoda et al v. Student Government Association Elections Board et al
as 4:2017cv00761
Plaintiff:
Sydney Vegoda and Dylan Edwards
Defendant:
Student Government Association Elections Board, Karen Becker, Taylor Christian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Nance et al
as 1:2016cv01134
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Rodgers
Defendant:
Craig Nance, Hamilton County Sheriff and Hamilton County, Ohio/Board Of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rodgers v. USA
as 3:2016cv00262
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bratcher v. Rodgers et al
as 1:2016cv00657
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Bratcher
Defendant:
Matthew Rodgers and Hamilton County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pullen v. Cool et al
as 1:2016cv00515
Plaintiff:
Terry Tyrone Pullen, Jr
Defendant:
William Cool, Cynthia Davis, David Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Solano County Courts et al
as 2:2015cv02754
Plaintiff:
Otis Lee Rodgers
Defendant:
Solano County Courts, Jackson K. Harris, Sara Andrew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
