Cases 41 - 50 of 1,677
Rogers v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00990
Plaintiff:
Vivian Ann Rogers
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
White v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2023cv00925
Plaintiff:
Jacob White
Defendant:
The State of Texas, The City of Grapevine, Bruno Rumbelow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. USA
as 9:2023cv00160
Petitioner:
Terrell Justin Rogers
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Rogers v. Winebrenner
as 9:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Terrell Justin Rogers
Defendant:
Rhonda Michele Winebrenner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
North v. Bank et al
as 4:2023cv03313
Plaintiff:
Julius Lamunn North
Defendant:
Discover Bank and Roger Hochschild
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dodd v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00146
Petitioner:
Roger Lavoy Dodd
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Utz v. Tractor Supply Co. of Texas, LP
as 4:2023cv00867
Plaintiff:
Roger Utz
Defendant:
Tractor Supply Co. of Texas, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rogers v. State Farm
as 6:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
Shirley E Rogers
Defendant:
State Farm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Blackburn v. Lubbock FBI et al
as 5:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Amy Louise Blackburn
Defendant:
Lubbock FBI, John Waters, Sr., John Waters, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Rogers v. City of Santa Fe et al
as 4:2023cv02757
Plaintiff:
Taylor Rose Rogers
Defendant:
City of Santa Fe, Ruben Espinoza and Christian Carranza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
