Cases 41 - 50 of 262
AMAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv28807
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Plaintiff:
AMAKER and RONALD EDWARD AMAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ronald Edward Hollis v. Santa Barbara County Sheriffs Dept.
as 2:2020cv02168
Plaintiff:
Ronald Edward Hollis
Defendant:
Santa Barbara County Sheriffs Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv18331
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD EDWARD RICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01948
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00056
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Dunbar v. Nielsen et al
as 2:2020cv00810
Respondent:
Matthew Albence, JOHN TSOUKARIS, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN and others
Petitioner:
Peter Lee Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00839
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CEBALLOS v. BARR et al
as 2:2020cv00422
Respondent:
MATTHEW ALBENCE, JOHN TSOUKARIS, JEFFERSON BEAUREGARD SESSIONS, III and others
Petitioner:
WILLIAM SANTILLIAN CEBALLOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Caudle v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2020cv00098
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Romero, -, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, E. Frijas and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Edward Caudle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JOYNER v. MAIORANA et al
as 3:2019cv05002
Defendant:
C MAIORANA, M NEAL, R BETHEA and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD EDWARD JOYNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
