Cases 41 - 50 of 117
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv01580
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PEGRAM, SHELLEY MANKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv01457
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PILLAI, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEITZ et al v. EAST NOTTINGHAM TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2016cv04130
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. SEITZ, III and HICKORY HILL GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
EAST NOTTINGHAM TOWNSHIP , EAST NOTTINGHAM TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS , WINIFRED MORAN SEBASTIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHELLEY v. CAPPOZZI
as 2:2016cv03862
Plaintiff:
LEROY SHELLEY
Defendant:
JOHN CAPPOZZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COHN v. COHN et al
as 2:2015cv03319
Plaintiff:
FLORENCE SMERCONISH COHN
Defendant:
MARTIN COHN, SHELLEY COHN SCHMIDT and CYNTHIA COHN HIERBAUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SLATER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv00502
Plaintiff:
MARLENE SLATER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT , SHELLEY R. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STANLEY et al v. PFIZER, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv05578
Plaintiff:
MASON WYATT STANLEY and SHELLEY ANN FORCE
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC., PFIZER INTERNATIONAL LLC, WYETH LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
FRANCIS v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv02647
Plaintiff:
OMAR FRANCIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, SHELLEY M. DOWDELL, GREGORY BARBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
