Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Spears v. Rivera
as 0:2011cv01206
Petitioner:
Dwight Lamar Spears
Respondent:
Mildred Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Spears v. USA
as 6:2011cv70052
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dwight Lamar Spears
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv01927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Spears v. United States of America
as 0:2009cv03125
Petitioner:
Dwight Lamar Spears
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Spears v. USA
as 6:2009cv70119
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dwight Lamar Spears
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Spears v. McBride et al
as 6:2009cv02800
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lee Spears, Jr
Defendant:
Keith McBride, Anthony Padula, R Hilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Spears v. SC Dept of Probation Parole and Pardon Services et al
as 0:2009cv02755
Plaintiff:
Dwight Spears
Defendant:
SC Dept of Probation Parole and Pardon Services, Autumn Daniels and Richard Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Magwood v. Heritage Trust Federal Credit Union et al
as 2:2009cv02751
Plaintiff:
Andrea J Magwood
Defendant:
Heritage Trust Federal Credit Union, Heritage Trust Federal Credit Union, Wayne Whitworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spear v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 8:2009cv02357
Plaintiff:
Sheila Spear
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Spear v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 8:2009cv02100
Plaintiff:
Sheila Spear
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
