Cases 41 - 50 of 88
Hendricks v. Santiago
as 1:2018cv00289
Plaintiff:
Virgil Hendricks
Defendant:
Ruben Santiago
Movant:
Southern Insurance Company of Virginia
Cross_claimant:
Southern Insurance Company of Virginia
Cross_defendant:
Ruben Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Santiago v. EWS Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv03219
Plaintiff:
Gloria Santiago
Defendant:
EWS Associates, LLC and Erich W. Schuetz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Bentz et al v. Taishan Gypsum Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv02892
Plaintiff:
Kelly Bentz , Scott Spires , James Blankenship and others
Defendant:
Taishan Gypsum Co., Ltd., Tai'an Taishan Plasterboard Co., Ltd, Beijing New Building Materials Public Limited Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Progressive Mountain Insurance Company v. Rangel et al
as 3:2017cv00098
Plaintiff:
Progressive Mountain Insurance Company
Defendant:
Carlos Rangel, Benjamin Mancillas Nunez, Marvin Rivera Pineda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Teran v. Johns
as 5:2017cv00009
Petitioner:
Santiago Teran
Respondent:
Tracy Johns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rowe v. Werner Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03856
Plaintiff:
Altamese Rowe
Defendant:
Werner Enterprises, Inc. , Michael J. Escobar-Santiago and John Does 1-3
Movant:
Lawrence L. Buddoo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Taylor v. Williams et al
as 6:2016cv00137
Plaintiff:
Frank James Taylor
Defendant:
Doug Williams, Smith, Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. WILLIAMS et al
as 5:2016cv00425
Plaintiff:
FRANK JAMES TAYLOR
Defendant:
DOUG WILLIAMS, SMITH, MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. KING
as 7:2016cv00123
Plaintiff:
MACY CIARA JOHNSON
Defendant:
SANTIAGO LOPAZ KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWBERN v. CLINCH COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 7:2015cv00229
Plaintiff:
JESSICA NICOLE NEWBERN
Defendant:
CLINCH COUNTY GEORGIA, HOMERVILLE, SANTIAGO LOPEZ KING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
