Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 613
Finger v. AVEO Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10408
Plaintiff: Susan Finger
Defendant: AVEO Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Kenneth M. Bate, Michael P. Bailey and others
Scarlett v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04876
Plaintiff: Michael Scarlett
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lorenson v. AVEO Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10273
Plaintiff: Sheldon Lorenson
Defendant: AVEO Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Kenneth M. Bate, Michael P. Bailey and others
Rabalais v. Charter Communications, Inc.
as 5:2022cv00637
Plaintiff: SCARLETT RABALAIS
Defendant: CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Samuel Dickerson v. Ken Scarlette, et al
as 22-3167
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAMUEL DICKERSON
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN DOE, Sergeant, Springfield Police Officer, JANE DOE, Springfield Police Officer, MICHAEL SULLIVAN, Public Defender and others
Scarlett v. The Litigation Practice Group PC
as OHS/3:22-CV-00342
Plaintiff: Scarlett and Kathlene Scarlett
Defendant: The Litigation Practice Group PC
Scarlett v. The Litigation Practice Group PC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00342
Plaintiff: Kathlene Scarlett
Defendant: The Litigation Practice Group PC
Scarlett v. The Litigation Practice Group PC
as 2:2022cv04106
Plaintiff: Kathlene Scarlett
Defendant: The Litigation Practice Group PC
Sharma v. Rent the Runway, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06935
Plaintiff: Rajat Sharma
Defendant: Rent the Runway, Inc., Jennifer Y. Hyman, Scarlett O'Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Eckerd v. Lush et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00125
Plaintiff: Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant: Nigel Lush, Keith Higgins, Glynn County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?