Cases 41 - 50 of 125
Melvin Ingram, et al v. Robert Moore, et al
as 2:2017cv02795
Plaintiff:
Melvin Ingram , Shantel Adams , David Beck and others
Defendant:
Robert Moore , Charlene McGhee , Debra Hammons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00639
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Braden v. Moore et al
as 2:2017cv02206
Plaintiff:
Derrick Ranard Braden
Defendant:
Robert Moore, Shannon Green, Andrew Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv02994
Movant:
Bernard Shaw
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smiley v. The State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2016cv00469
Plaintiff:
Bruce A Smiley
Defendant:
The State of Tennessee, Tennessee Rehabiliative Initiatives in Correction, Veit Spero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Rhodes et al
as 1:2016mc00049
Plaintiff:
Quincy D Scott, Sr.
Defendant:
Josh Rhodes, Jim Shaw, Freddie Shultz and others
Scott v. Rhodes et al
as 1:2016cv00392
Plaintiff:
Quincy D Scott, Sr.
Defendant:
Josh Rhodes, Jim Shaw, Freddie Shultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. State Farm VP Management Corp.
as 2:2016cv02717
Plaintiff:
Shaundra H Shaw
Defendant:
State Farm VP Management Corp.
Miscellaneou:
Donna L. Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quigley v. Mondelez Global, LLC et al (PLR1)
as 2:2014cv00075
Plaintiff:
Rachelle Lynn Quigley
Defendant:
Mondelez Global, LLC, Mondelez International, Inc. and Penske Truck Leasing Co. L.P.
Not Classified By Court:
Mediator Tracy Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America et al v. Shaw
as 1:2016cv01039
Petitioner:
United States of America and Shawnna Sullivan
Respondent:
Richmond Shaw
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
