Cases 41 - 50 of 93
SHEPHERD v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 3:2013cv00018
Plaintiff:
Leroy Shepherd
Defendant:
Federal Bureau (of) Prisons , Warden Ronnie R. Holt , Lieutenant Snow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADEYANJU et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC.
as 2:2012cv04018
Plaintiff:
VICTOR ADEYANJU , KEVIN ALDRIDGE , WILLIAM BLACKWELL and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHEPHERD v. PITTSBURGH GLASS WORKS, LLC
as 2:2012cv00483
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. SHEPHERD
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH GLASS WORKS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
SHEPHERD v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv01885
Plaintiff:
GLEN SHEPHERD, JR.
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PEARSON et al v. TANNER et al
as 2:2012cv00798
Plaintiff:
JEFFRY S. PEARSON and ALLEN L. FEINGOLD
Defendant:
MARK W. TANNER, THERESA ALLEN, JERRY ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
SHEPHERD v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56365
Plaintiff:
ROBERT R. SHEPHERD
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SHEPHERD v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56890
Plaintiff:
DONALD R. SHEPHERD
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SHEPHERD v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv06783
Plaintiff:
PAUL SHEPHERD
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY, J. DERITA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEPHERD v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv42167
Plaintiff:
JOE SHEPHERD
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SHEPHERD v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv34310
Plaintiff:
LOUIS C. SHEPHERD
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
