Cases 41 - 50 of 10,310
Eusebio-Rojas v. Singh et al
as 1:2024cv04343
Plaintiff:
Eroc Eusebio-Rojas
Defendant:
Harpreet Singh and HSG LOGISTICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
SHEWMAKER et al v. YARDI SYSTEMS INC et al
as 4:2024cv00085
Defendant:
BALACIANO GROUP, YARDI SYSTEMS INC, ALCO MANAGEMENT INC and others
Plaintiff:
MADISON SHEWMAKER and JAMAAR FAISON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024at00721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03472
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mora v. C. Chestnut et al
as 2:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
Martin Xavier Mora
Defendant:
C. Chestnut, Mr. D'Amico and Dr. Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Fisher v. KN Express, Inc. et al.
as 3:2024cv00974
Plaintiff:
Executor Kent Fisher
Defendant:
KN Express, Inc. and Pritpal Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sanders v. City of Piedmont et al
as 3:2024cv03385
Plaintiff:
Antonio Sanders
Defendant:
City of Piedmont, Brian Castillo and Jasdeep Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
