Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Sneade v. Vargo
as 3:2013cv00398
Petitioner:
Stephen Michael Sneade
Respondent:
Marie Vargo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cuffee v. Rosser et al
as 2:2012cv00646
Plaintiff:
Robert Cuffee
Defendant:
Ms. Rosser, Mrs. Gaskens, Mrs. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00033
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Borboa v. Chandler et al
as 3:2011cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kerrie Borboa
Defendant:
Theodore L. Chandler, Janet A. Alpert, Gale K. Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Romano v. City of Lynchburg, Virginia et al
as 6:2009cv00040
Plaintiff:
John C. Romano
Defendant:
City of Lynchburg, Virginia, Kimball Payne, III and Col. Parks H. Snead, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Snead v. Alleghany Sheriff Department
as 7:2009cv00198
Plaintiff:
Cedric O. Snead
Defendant:
Alleghany Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Terzenbach v. LandAmerica Financial Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00757
Plaintiff:
Gary Terzenbach
Defendant:
LandAmerica Financial Group, Inc., Theodore Chandler, Marshall Wishnack and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Wallace v. Johnson et al
as 2:2008cv00108
Plaintiff:
Davin Wallace
Defendant:
Gene Johnson, G. K. Washington, Fred Schilling and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Audrey F. jaCobs, Limited v. jaCobs et al
as 3:2007cv00617
Plaintiff:
Audrey F. jaCobs, Limited
Defendant:
Audrey F. jaCobs, City of Richmond, Claude G. Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
