Cases 41 - 50 of 337
Poor v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
William Poor
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, David Mitchell, W. Lawless and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bellman v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv07131
Plaintiff:
Spencer M Bellman
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Golman v American Osteopathic Association
as 1:2022cv06283
Plaintiff:
Arron Spencer Golman
Defendant:
AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Dorn v. Jefferys et al
as 3:2022cv02378
Plaintiff:
James Dorn
Defendant:
Rob Jefferys, Lisa Weitekamp, David W. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Bernice et al
as 1:2022cv01330
Plaintiff:
George E Love
Defendant:
. Bernice, Carmisha Turner and . Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Gaffner et al
as 1:2022cv01319
Defendant:
Trisha Gaffner, Kingsley Keys, Mallory Brittenham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gaffner et al v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2022cv01320
Plaintiff:
Trisha Gaffner, Kingsley Keys, Mallory Brittenham and others
Defendant:
Jay R Pritzker, Illinois State Board of Education, Illinois Department of Public Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Eskridge v. Dufresne Spencer Group LLC
as 1:2022cv04998
Plaintiff:
Margaret Eskridge
Defendant:
DSG Illinois, LLC d/b/a Ashley Homestore, DSG Illinois, LLC doing business as Ashley Homestore and The Dufresne Spencer Group, LLC f/k/a DSG Illinois, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
