Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Cook et al v. Sulligent, Alabama, City of et al
as 6:2010cv01713
Plaintiff: Jason Cook and Jennifer Cook
Defendant: Sulligent, Alabama, City of, Sulligent Police Department, The City of, Willis Stanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanford v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2009cv02020
Plaintiff: Ann Marie Stanford
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mendenhall et al v. Blackmun et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00298
Plaintiff: Linda Mendenhall, Stanford Mendenhall and Amazing Grace Bed & Breakfast
Defendant: Henrietta Blackmun, Andrew Cromer, City of Camden, AL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights None
Stanford v. Brantley et al (MAG+) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00750
Plaintiff: Shaenea Stanford
Defendant: Mark Brantley and Henry County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00718
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
Stanford v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2008cv00441
Plaintiff: Janet L. Stanford
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Vidger et al v. Stanford et al
as 2:2008cv00137
Plaintiff: Teresa M. Vidger and Elizabeth A. Spitler
Defendant: James L. Stanford, III, Patricia Jane O'Neal and Robertson Banking Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None
Noe v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00499
Plaintiff: Woodburck Noe
Defendant: Alabama Department of Corrections, Richard F. Allen, Ms. Sparks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?