Cases 41 - 50 of 1,563
Diale v. State of Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Amber Marie Diale
Defendant:
State of Virginia, State of Kansas, State of Wisconsin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Diale v. State of Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Amber Marie Diale
Defendant:
State of Virginia, State of North Carolina, State of Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Diale v. State of Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Amber Marie Diale
Defendant:
State of Virginia, State of Kansas, State of Wisconsin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Quordalis Sanders v. State of Wisconsin, et al
as 23-3318
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUORDALIS V. SANDERS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WISCONSIN, RACINE COUNTY, WISCONSIN, LUCAS P. BENNEWITZ and others
Howard, Frank v. State of Wisconsin
as 3:2023cv00823
Petitioner:
Frank P. Howard
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wouts v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2023cv01558
Petitioner:
Alex A Wouts
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
State of Wisconsin v. Roy Derksen
as 23-3211
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF WISCONSIN
Defendant / Appellant:
ROY C. DERKSEN
Roy Derksen v. State of Wisconsin, et al
as 23-3194
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY C. DERKSEN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WISCONSIN, FOND DU LAC COUNTY, WISCONSIN, TONY EVERS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Stewart, Timothy v. Bricco, Mary et al.
as 3:2023cv00766
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Stewart, Sr.
Defendant:
Mary Bricco, David O'Leary, Rock County Jane/John Doe Court Clerk; Managers(s) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
