Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Paik v. Fair et al
as 4:2018cv02513
Defendant:
Kevin M. Slawin, Alan A. Musso, Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Seung Paik
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Stone v. Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01672
Defendant:
Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc., Stephen R. Davis and Todd S. Young
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Stone, II
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 j(b)ss Stockholder Suit
Davis v. Zucker, MD, JD et al
as 1:2018cv03211
Defendant:
Lee Burns, Howard A. Zucker, MD, JD, New York State of Health Bureau of EMS and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen E. Davis, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pelletier v. Texas State Board of Plumbing Examiners et al
as 6:2017cv00062
Plaintiff:
Gaetan Pelletier
Defendant:
Texas State Board of Plumbing Examiners, Jon Lawson, Stephen P. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 41 U.S.C. § 251
Synthes USA LLC et al v. Davis et al
as 4:2017cv02879
Plaintiff:
Synthes USA LLC , DePuy Spine LLC and DePuy Synthes Sales Inc
Defendant:
Stephen N Davis, Jr , Jeffrey A Domico and K2M Group Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID CASE TRANSFERRED TO LUFKIN DIVISION
as 6:2017cv00177
Petitioner:
Stephen Earl Davis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2017cv00043
Petitioner:
Stephen Earl Davis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2017cv00174
Petitioner:
Stephen Earl Davis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Savini v. Hacksell et al
as 3:2016cv02572
Plaintiff:
Erik Savini
Defendant:
Uli Hacksell, Stephen R. Davis, Roger Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White v. Davis
as 1:2016cv23713
Plaintiff:
Panceta C White
Defendant:
Stephen Carr Davis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
