Cases 41 - 50 of 2,219
Graham v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Tommy James Graham, Jr.
Defendant:
J. Artrip, Thompson, Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonacci v. Emanuel et al
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Mr. Louis B Antonacci and Louis B Antonacci
Defendant:
Rahm Israel Emanuel, Stephen Brett Shapiro, Paul J Kiernan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Deane v. M&T Bank
as 2:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Ryan Omowale Deane
Defendant:
M&T Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Williams v. Watson et al
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Corey T. Williams
Defendant:
Mr. D. Watson and Mr. J.D. Oates III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
William T. McDonald
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Primelending, A Plains Capital Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Coleman v. The City of Norfolk, Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00045
Defendant:
Leandra Mae Tanner, The City of Norfolk, Virginia, Robert Foley and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Byrd v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Byrd
Defendant:
Mr. T. Hamilton, John Does and Mr. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez et al v. Truist Bank
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Gregory T Rodriguez and Kathleen J Rodriguez
Defendant:
Truist Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Ofori v. Combs et al
as 7:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
Mr. J. Combs, Mr. Anderson, B.L. Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
