Cases 41 - 50 of 110
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2012cv80720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
The Cadle Company II,Inc v. Mytelka
as 1:2012mc00168
Plaintiff:
The Cadle Company II,Inc
Defendant:
Robert B Mytelka
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
The Cadle Company II, Inc. v. Robert Mytelka
as 12-5141
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE CADLE COMPANY II, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT B. MYTELKA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2274
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
The Cadle Company II, Inc. et al v. Hubbard et al
as 1:2011cv00064
Plaintiff:
The Cadle Company II, Inc.
Defendant:
Raymond N. Hubbard , Holly G. Hubbard , Carol B. Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sand Creek Partners, LTD et al v. American Federal Savings and Loan Association of Colorado et al
as 2:2011ms00046
Defendant:
American Federal Savings and Loan Association of Colorado and Resolution Trust Corporation Receiver for American Savings of Colorado
Plaintiff:
William L. Bergman, Larry Bortles and Sand Creek Partners, LTD
Interested Party:
The Cadle Company
The Cadle Company II, Inc. et al v. Hubbard et al
as 4:2011cv00711
Plaintiff:
The Cadle Company II, Inc.
Defendant:
Raymond N. Hubbard, Holly G. Hubbard, Carol B. Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks v. The Cadle Company et al
as 1:2011mc00078
Plaintiff:
Kerry R. Hicks
Defendant:
The Cadle Company, Buckeye Retirement Co., LLC., LTD, William E. Shaulis and others
Cause Of Action: M 18-302 Registration of Foreign Judgment
Gary Cooper v. Diane Reed, et al
as 11-10009
Debtor:
In the Matter of: GARY R. COOPER and JUNANNE M. COOPER
Appellant:
GARY COOPER
Appellee:
DIANE G REED, Chapter 7 Trustee and CADLE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
