Cases 41 - 50 of 165
David Meyers v. Foothills Correctional Institute Wardens
as 23-6692
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE WARDENS, BEVINS, Lieutenant, CLARK, Sergeant and others
Oxendine v. Moose et al
as 5:2023ct03196
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Oxendine
Defendant:
Timothy D. Moose, Todd E. Ishee, Kimberly D. Grande and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Letterlough v. Cothron et al
as 5:2023ct03192
Plaintiff:
Derrick Derrail Letterlough and Derrick Letterlough
Defendant:
David E. Cothron, Demetrius A. Clark and Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lunsford v. Jacob et al
as 5:2023ct03176
Plaintiff:
Jamel Tyree Lunsford
Defendant:
Warden Jacob, Warden Locklear, Todd E. Ishee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Jones v. Crystal Atkinson
as 23-6529
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH W. JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
CRYSTAL ATKINSON, CAPTAIN MCPHERSON, SGT HONEYCUTT and others
Defendant:
SGT GRAHAM, SGT JOLLY, SGT FLOYD and others
Matthew Safrit v. Todd Ishee
as 23-6503
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW A. SAFRIT
Respondent / Appellee:
TODD E. ISHEE
Willie Martin, III v. Mary Locklear
as 23-6499
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE LEE MARTIN, III
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY LOCKLEAR, TODD E. ISHEE and ROY COOPER
Yates v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023hc02078
Petitioner:
William Yates
Respondent:
Todd E. Ishee, Sean T. Dillard, Teresa O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willie Martin, III v. Mary Locklear
as 23-6291
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE LEE MARTIN, III
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY LOCKLEAR and TODD E. ISHEE
HARRIS v. ISHEE
as 1:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANTHONY HARRIS
Defendant:
TODD E. ISHEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
