Cases 41 - 50 of 98
Trujillo v. CACH LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00419
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Trujillo
Defendant:
CACH LLC and Neuheisel Law Firm PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mallery v. Jewell et al
as 3:2015cv08021
Plaintiff:
William H Mallery, IV
Defendant:
Sally Jewell, Cecilia Shields, Kayci Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Trujillo v. USA
as 4:2014cv02155
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alfonso Mendoza Trujillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Trujillo v. Detamore
as 4:2013cv02397
Plaintiff:
Andres Adrian Trujillo, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Detumor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated v. Trujillo et al
as 4:2013cv01099
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated
Defendant:
Hermenia Trujillo and Trujillo Enterprises LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Laura M Wells et al v. American Polygraph Association et al
as 2:2013cv00607
Plaintiff:
Laura M Wells, Kelley L Bradbury, Morgan M Block and others
Defendant:
American Polygraph Association, Barry Cushman, Charles Slupski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Higdon v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv00475
Plaintiff:
David A Higdon
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan , Karyn E Klausner, Unknown Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Trujillo-Perez v. USA
as 4:2012cv00887
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Demetrio Trujillo-Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Trujillo-Matus v. USA
as 2:2012cv02238
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Loreto Trujillo-Matus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Gawlik v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2012cv01946
Plaintiff:
Brian Gawlik
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Corrections, Jeffrey Annis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
