Cases 41 - 50 of 111
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
City of Norfolk, Virginia et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2019cv00436
Plaintiff:
City of Norfolk, Virginia and Norfolk City Council
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Gregory D. Underwood, Commonwealth's Attorney for the City of Norfolk and Mark R. Herring, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia
Intervenor:
Ronald M. Green and Roy L. Perry-Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
White v. City of Norfolk, et al
as 2:2019cv00351
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Boyd White, III
Defendant:
City of Norfolk and Paige Bishop Colletta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Norfolk, VA v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv00299
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Norfolk, VA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Butts v. Beye et al
as 1:2019cv00376
Defendant:
George E. Schaefer, Junius P. Fulton, III, Norfolk Circuit Court and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Lee Butts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hursey v. City Of Norfolk
as 2:2019cv00148
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Hursey, Jr.
Defendant:
Virginia City Of Norfolk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Matousek v. City of Norfolk et al
as 2:2018cv00609
Defendant:
Norfolk Police Dept. and City of Norfolk
Plaintiff:
Susan N. Matousek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wright v. City of Norfolk
as 2:2018cv00511
Plaintiff:
Carl Kent Wright
Defendant:
City of Norfolk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
