Cases 41 - 50 of 88
v. Imbraguglio et al
as 3:2021cv00735
Defendant:
Dominick August Imbraguglio, James M LeBlanc, Seth Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Funes v. Hooper et al
as 3:2021cv00689
Plaintiff:
Mario Funes
Defendant:
Timothy Hooper, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simms v. Hooper et al
as 3:2021cv00612
Plaintiff:
Sedrick Simms
Defendant:
Timothy Hooper, L. Ramsey, J. Mancheser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray et al v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00536
Plaintiff:
Ms. Kelly Gray, Mr. Michael Foley, Kelly Gray and others
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections, Louisiana Attorney General, Timothy Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
v. Gray et al
as 3:2021cv00533
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections, Louisiana Attorney General and Timothy Hooper
Claimant:
Kelly Gray and Michael Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Hooper et al
as 3:2021cv00486
Petitioner:
Curtis Gordon
Respondent:
Timothy Hooper, James M. LeBlanc and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. Fleischman
as 2:2021cv01494
Plaintiff:
Vance Keith Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
Daniel Fleischman and Timothy Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miller v. Hooper
as 2:2021cv01413
Plaintiff:
Corey Miller
Defendant:
Timothy Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bailey v. Hooper et al
as 3:2021cv00421
Petitioner:
Benjamin Bailey
Respondent:
Timothy Hooper and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Louisiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00390
Plaintiff:
Deshunta Miller
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Corrections, James M Leblanc, Timothy Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
