Cases 41 - 50 of 76
Harrison v. Jindal et al
as 3:2014cv00804
Defendant:
AT&T Phone Company, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Tramaine Antonio Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly #225090 v. Stoddard et al
as 1:2014cv01278
Plaintiff:
Opelton Kelly #225090
Defendant:
Cathleen Stoddard, Unknown Young, R. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tribble v. Buscher et al
as 3:2014cv00099
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Allen Tribble
Defendant:
James Buscher, Unknown Roberts, J. Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laurent v. Management Training Corp. et al
as 4:2013cv00181
Plaintiff:
Leo L. Laurent
Defendant:
Management Training Corp., Unknown Buscher, Unknown Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Voyles v. MTC et al
as 4:2013cv00161
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Voyles
Defendant:
MTC and Unknown Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Voyles v. MTC et al
as 3:2013cv01051
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Voyles
Defendant:
Unknown Roberts, Scott Marquardt , Ray Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. Town of DeKalb Municipal Court et al
as 4:2013cv00033
Plaintiff:
John E. Palmer
Defendant:
Town of DeKalb Municipal Court, Brenda Nelson, Unknown Robert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. King et al
as 1:2013cv00511
Plaintiff:
La Tidtus Jones
Defendant:
Ron King , Theresa Seabrook , Hubert Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. King et al
as 2:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
La Tidtus Jones
Defendant:
Ron King, Theresa Seabrook, Hubert Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonathan Bertanelli v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 12-16990
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN CATALDO BERTANELLI
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of ADOC, CHRIS MENDOZA, Deputy Warden at ASPC, MICHAEL ADU-TUTU, Deputy Director (ADOC) Inmate Health Services and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
