Cases 41 - 50 of 3,861
Emmett v. IRS et al
as 1:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Barry Emmett
Defendant:
IRS, IRS Corporation, IRS Director Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
(HC) Givens v. Warden at USP Atwater
as 1:2024cv00317
Petitioner:
Gregory Latrell Givens
Respondent:
Warden at USP Atwater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Davis v. USP Coleman II
as 5:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Raynard Davis
Defendant:
USP Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Quezada v. USP Tucson
as 5:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Graciano Pina Quezada
Defendant:
USP Tucson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Greer v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2024cv00233
Petitioner:
Andrew Greer
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Edwards v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2024cv00234
Petitioner:
Daco Zanquello Edwards
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Matthews v. USP McCreary et al
as 6:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Louis R. Matthews
Defendant:
USP McCreary, Colette Peters, John Gilley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
James v. Warden, USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Crandall James
Respondent:
Warden, USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Aloba v. Coleman USP I et al
as 5:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Oriyomi Sadiq Aloba
Defendant:
Coleman USP I and Warden of Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Chambers v. SHU Staff at USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dontriel Chambers
Defendant:
SHU Staff at USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
