Cases 41 - 50 of 194
SYMMES v. COVINGTON et al
as 1:2020cv00887
Defendant:
VICTOR LOCKLEAR, ANGELA M. DELLARIPA, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tikhonov v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, et al
as 1:2020cv00252
Defendant:
THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY d/b/a LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP, SOUTHEASTERN CONTAINER, INC. and The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company doing business as Lincoln Financial Group
Plaintiff:
VICTOR TIKHONOV
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Dorm v. USA
as 7:2020cv00165
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Victor Eugene Dorm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Clayton v. Johnson et al
as 5:2020ct03252
Defendant:
Sgt. Charles K. Barbour, Lt. Angie Hinson, Sgt. Dwight Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Clayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sanders v. Locklear et al
as 5:2020ct03095
Defendant:
Victor Locklear, Sergeant Peaks, Sean Dillard and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Pereira et al
as 5:2019ct03362
Defendant:
Diana Pereira, Jane Pearce and Susan Umstead
Plaintiff:
Victor B. Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Everett v. Andrews
as 5:2019hc02287
Petitioner:
Ronnie Victor Everett
Respondent:
Warden Justin Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ZOU et al v. MARKET AMERICA, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00954
Defendant:
DOLLY KUO, MARKET AMERICA WORLDWIDE INC., LIU LUCY HONG and others
Plaintiff:
OLLIE LAN, JINHUA ZOU, CHUANJIE YANG and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Stokes v. Herring et al
as 5:2019ct03260
Defendant:
John A. Herring, Michael O. Arthur and Officer Burgess
Plaintiff:
George Victor Stokes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. Herring et al
as 5:2019ct03254
Defendant:
John A. Herring, Dudley Johnson, Officer Burgess and others
Plaintiff:
George Victor Stokes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
