Cases 41 - 50 of 82
Warner v. Smith
as 5:2014cv00222
Petitioner:
Earl William Warner
Respondent:
Aron Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bishop v. Time Warner Cable Inc.
as 3:2014cv00356
Plaintiff:
Jessica Bishop
Defendant:
Time Warner Cable Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Coram et al v. Shepherd Communications, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00298
Plaintiff:
Ian Coram , George Bright , Philip Hess and others
Defendant:
Shepherd Communications, Inc. , Time Warner Cable, Inc. and Insight Communications Company, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Warner v. Skechers USA, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00001
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Warner
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roach et al v. Hughes et al
as 4:2013cv00136
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Roach and Stephen Philip Roach, II
Defendant:
Laura Hughes , Warner Chilcott Sales (US) LLC , Warner Chilcott, PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
GGNSC Louisville Hillcreek, LLC et al v. Warner
as 3:2013cv00752
Plaintiff:
GGNSC Louisville Hillcreek, LLC , GGNSC Administrative Services, LLC , GGNSC Holdings, LLC and others
Defendant:
Randall Warner
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Collins Bowling Centers, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv00173
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , Fort Knox Music, Inc. , T/Q Music, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Collins Bowling Centers, Inc., Patrick F. Collins and Daniel M. Collins
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Warner v. City of Brooksville et al
as 2:2013cv00057
Plaintiff:
Justin Warner
Defendant:
City of Brooksville and Martin Hause
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
