Cases 41 - 50 of 183
Watson v. Synchrony Bank, N.A.
as 8:2020cv03164
Plaintiff:
John Watson
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Watson v. Saul
as 8:2020cv03016
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
April Cheryl Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Watson v. Consumer Cellular
as 8:2020cv02498
Defendant:
Consumer Cellular
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Watson v. Homebridge Financial Services, Inc.
as 8:2020cv02578
Defendant:
Homebridge Financial Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
DAISHA WATSON
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605
Watson v. MedStar Health, Inc et al
as 1:2020cv02250
Defendant:
Pension and Benefits Committee of Medstar Health, Inc., Board of Directors of Medstar Health, Inc. and MedStar Health, Inc
Plaintiff:
Xania E Watson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Watson v. USA - 2255
as 8:2020cv01595
Petitioner:
Donte Edward Watson
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Town Of Cottage City et al v. Allergan plc et al
as 8:2020cv00796
Plaintiff:
Town Of Cottage City, Town of North Brentwood, The Town of Upper Marlboro and others
Defendant:
Mallinckrodt, LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Pharmedium Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lewis v. Maryland State et al
as 1:2020cv00343
Defendant:
ECI, Kevin Teves, Mark Schoenfelder and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Watson v. Cody et al
as 1:2020cv00012
Defendant:
Brian Murphy, Joseph O'Brien, Magan Lazak and others
Plaintiff:
Konishia Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The County Commissioner of Carroll County, Maryland v. Allergan PLC et al
as 1:2019cv03254
Defendant:
Specgx, LLC, Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
The County Commissioner of Carroll County, Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
