Cases 41 - 50 of 118
KNIGHT, JR v. HALE et al
as 1:2017cv02965
Defendant:
WEBSTER CAMPBELL, MARK DEICHMAN, MARK HALE and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY DEAN KNIGHT, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEBSTER v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv02876
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only), SSA-USAO (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
ALBERTA WEBSTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
WEBSTER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv02510
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
LORIANN WEBSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Webster et al v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00295
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Webster and Carlos Rhodes
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC and Biomet Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 v. WEBSTER et al
as 1:2016cv03484
Plaintiff:
CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2
Defendant:
DOUGLAS HAYGOOD and JOSEPH WEBSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WEBSTER et al v. CENTER FOR DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv02677
Defendant:
CDI INDIANA, LLC and CENTER FOR DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING, INC.
Plaintiff:
BRIAN WEBSTER and COURTNEY WEBSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Webster v. USA
as 3:2016cv00230
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Tommy Webster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
WEBSTER v. COOK, et al.
as 1:2016cv00608
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
NANCY WEBSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Webster v. US Attorney et al
as 3:2015cv00554
Plaintiff:
Tommy Webster
Defendant:
US Attorney, R Schaffer, South Bend Police Chief and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
