Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Anderson et al v. Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, P.C. et al
as 2:2017cv13289
Plaintiff:
Cyrstal Anderson , T. G. , M. L. and others
Defendant:
Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, P.C., Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc., Leo A. Daly Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Spearman v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2017cv12805
Plaintiff:
Rufus L. Spearman
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Department of Mental Health, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Andollo et al v. FCA US LLC
as 2:2017cv11376
Plaintiff:
Justine Andollo, Danielle Hackett, Joby Hackett and others
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Porter #890815 v. Wexford County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv00119
Defendant:
Wexford County Jail and Greg Webster
Plaintiff:
Junior A. Porter #890815
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Wexford County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv10185
Plaintiff:
Junior Porter
Defendant:
Wexford County Jail and Greg Webster
Lyons v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv14420
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Macomb Correctional Facility, Randall Haas and others
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Lyons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Andollo et al v. FCA US LLC
as 2:2016cv13681
Plaintiff:
Justine Andollo , Danielle Hackett , Joby Hackett and others
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FCA US LLC Monostable Electronic Gearshift Litigation
as 2:2016md02744
Plaintiff:
Bruce Vosburgh , Timothy Weber , Bernadine Hartt and others
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Webster #191109 v. Heyns et al
as 1:2016cv00291
Plaintiff:
Joseph Webster #191109
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns, Mary Berghuis and B. Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Macomb Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2015cv11780
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Preston Cook
Defendant:
Macomb Correctional Facility, Haas, Weberg and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
