Cases 41 - 50 of 259
Sims v. Maryland Department of Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 1:2019cv00704
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dr. Derosa, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Allen Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Tibbs v. Moran, et al
as 8:2019cv00613
Defendant:
The medical staff, Maryland Correctional Instition, Warden Moran and others
Plaintiff:
Rickey B. Tibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Dyson v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 8:2019cv00307
Defendant:
Dr. Memar, Richard Miller, P.A. Jamison and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Dyson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Washington v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv00259
Defendant:
John M. Froehlich, Jane Doe, Daniel L. Conn. and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Wadkins v. Wexford Health Services Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv00107
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services Inc. and Western Correctional Institution
Plaintiff:
Sean M. Wadkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Williams v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00033
Defendant:
Bernard Alenda, Jennifer Pope, Priscilla Momoh and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Robert Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roper v. Wexford Health Services, Inc
as 8:2019cv00021
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wayne Roper
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Haughie v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 1:2018cv03963
Defendant:
michael smith, charles williams, newman azuike and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Haughie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murray v. Memarsadeghi et al
as 8:2018cv03728
Plaintiff:
Chris Murray
Defendant:
Dr. Mahboobeh Memarsadeghi and Wexford Health Sources, INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Falkenstein v. Rahman et al
as 8:2018cv03715
Defendant:
Dr. Ashraf, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Bernice Swan and others
Plaintiff:
John W. Falkenstein
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
