Cases 41 - 50 of 311
Jeffery Ladner v. Lehman, et al
as 20-60255
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED, DR. RONALD WOODALL and DR. LEHMAN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERY LADNER
Chris Murray v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
as 20-6063
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED, DR. MAHBOOBEH MEMARSADEGHI, MD and WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRIS MURRAY
Clyde Macklin v. State of Maryland
as 19-7731
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MARYLAND, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED and JESSUP CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLYDE MACKLIN
Jackson v. Wexford Health Sources Incorporated et al
as 3:2019cv50321
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dixon Corr. Ctr., Tuell and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovejoy v. Watson et al
as 3:2019cv03298
Defendant:
Lynette Colvis, Cameron Watson, Tara Goins and others
Plaintiff:
Laurence Lovejoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovejoy v. Watson et al
as 3:2019cv01369
Defendant:
M. Price, Lynette Colvis, K. Kestner and others
Plaintiff:
Laurence Lovejoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. IDOC et al
as 3:2019cv01206
Defendant:
Dr. Siddiqui, Lt. Koehn, Jacqueline Lashbrook and others
Plaintiff:
Cortez Larnell Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle v. Ritz et al
as 3:2019cv01210
Defendant:
Steve Ritz and Wexford Health Sources Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Brian Doyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin Murray v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
as 19-7382
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED and RUTH PINKNEY, P.A.
Defendant:
WARDEN RICKY FOXWELL and WARDEN KATHLEEN GREEN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN WAYNE MURRAY
Jaquone Collins v. Dr. Sharon Baucom
as 19-7124
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER D. VANPELT, RN, STACIE MAST, RN, ADAORA ODUNZA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAQUONE LAKEEM COLLINS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
