Cases 41 - 50 of 580
Kreus #058309 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01273
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lynn Kreus
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Perro, P Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv08113
Plaintiff:
Matthew White
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Isaacson et al v. Brnovich et al
as 2:2021cv01417
Plaintiff:
Paul A Isaacson, Eric M Reuss, National Council of Jewish Women (Arizona Section) Incorporated and others
Defendant:
Mark Brnovich, Michael Whiting, Brian McIntyre and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Sharing Down Syndrome Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv08087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Tutt v. Menlove et al
as 2:2022cv00890
Plaintiff:
Roderick Citron Tutt
Defendant:
James Menlove, J Adam Shepherd, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meraz v. Nelson et al
as 2:2022cv00728
Plaintiff:
Alex Meraz
Defendant:
Roger A Nelson, Mary E White, David Shinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodland v. White Mountain Legal Aid et al
as 2:2022cv00253
Plaintiff:
Victoria Woodland
Defendant:
Southern Arizona Regal Aid, White Mountain Legal Aid and Southern Arizona Legal Aid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
White v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Kevin White
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Miller v. Clouse et al
as 3:2022cv08029
Plaintiff:
Cindy Miller
Defendant:
David Clouse, Brad Carlyon, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
