Cases 41 - 50 of 147
Mobley v. Kerns et al
as 5:2020cv03007
Defendant:
Kurt Kerns, Esq. and Kerns, Ariagno, Mank and White Law Firm
Plaintiff:
Bogdana Mobley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strader (ID 66677) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2019cv03218
Defendant:
(fnu) Echols, (fnu) Galloway, (fnu) Byers and others
Plaintiff:
James C. Strader
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maier (ID 104561) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2019cv03200
Plaintiff:
Christopher Coty Maier
Defendant:
Smart City, Signal Guard Nara, Kansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kemmerly v. Hill et al
as 5:2019cv03086
Defendant:
Jeremy Woodson, Cody Maley, Brian White and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniel Kemmerly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Americraft Carton Inc. v. White Pigeon Paper Co.
as 2:2019cv02090
Plaintiff:
Americraft Carton Inc.
Defendant:
White Pigeon Paper and White Pigeon Paper Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
White et al v. Azria Health of Olathe Kansas et al
as 5:2018cv04142
Defendant:
David C. Kirk, Patricia Nix, Patricia Lincoln and others
Plaintiff:
Kayla D. White, Vancile Aurthur White, Jr., Dorothy Mae White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. White et al
as 5:2018cv04135
Defendant:
Topeka Pulmonary, P.A., Tracey Jo Holtom, Stacy Ann White and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Holifield et al
as 5:2018cv04077
Defendant:
Larry C. Holifield, White's Roofing, LLC and Christie Dawn Holifield
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
White v. USA
as 2:2018cv02459
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard White, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
White v. Topeka, City of et al
as 5:2018cv04050
Plaintiff:
Kelly White
Defendant:
Topeka, City of, Michael Cruse, Justin Mackey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
