Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Wilder v. McCabe
as 3:2011cv00187
Petitioner:
Samuel Anthony Wilder
Respondent:
Wayne McCabe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilder v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 4:2010cv02368
Petitioner:
Sylvester Wilder
Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilder v. Brooks et al
as 3:2008cv03089
Plaintiff:
Samuel Anthony Wilder
Defendant:
Charles T Brooks, III, Markley R Dennis, Jr, Donald J Zelenka and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wilder v. South Carolina Department of Correction et al
as 3:2008cv02486
Plaintiff:
Samuel Anthony Wilder
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Correction and Jon Ozmint
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wilder v. Fairfield County School District et al
as 0:2008cv02419
Plaintiff:
Rose H Wilder
Defendant:
Fairfield County School District, Annie McDaniel, Monzell Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wilder v. Burt
as 3:2008cv00136
Petitioner:
Samuel Anthony Wilder
Respondent:
Stan Burt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Wilder v. Ozmint et al
as 2:2007cv02278
Plaintiff:
William Wilder
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, Robert Ward, Stan Burtt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Wilder v. Ozmint et al
as 2:2007cv02005
Plaintiff:
Samuel Anthony Wilder
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, Robert Ward, Stan Burtt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
