Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Daobin et al v. CISCO Systems, Inc. et al
as 8:2011cv01538
Plaintiff:
Du Daobin , Zhou Yuanzhi , Liu Xianbin and others
Defendant:
CISCO Systems, Inc. , Thomas Lam , Owen Chan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chambers v. USA - 2255
as 1:2011cv01083
Petitioner:
Kevin Chambers
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Chambers v. Chambers et al
as 8:2011cv00765
Plaintiff:
Theresa Chambers
Defendant:
Bonita Chambers and Dennis Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Chambers v. Markey et al
as 1:2009cv02878
Plaintiff:
Linda Chambers
Defendant:
Eric Markey and Unknown Officers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Chambers v. USA-2255
as 1:2009cv01765
Petitioner:
George Paul Chambers
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Garris v. Chief U.S. District Court Judge, et al
as 1:2009cv01504
Plaintiff:
Justin W. Garris
Defendant:
Chief U.S. District Court Judge, Chambers U.S. District Court Judge and Official Custodian Public Records U.S. District Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al v. Chertoff et al
as 8:2008cv03444
Plaintiff:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Albert A. Matera and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01378
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
