Cases 41 - 50 of 290
PSENCIK et al v. CORTEVA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv02423
Plaintiff:
Walter Psencik and Travis Psencik
Defendant:
Corteva, Inc., SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG, SYNGENTA CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Scott v. Warden
as 3:2022cv01030
Petitioner:
Travis Scott and Travis Michael Scott
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WICKLINE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02361
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS D. WICKLINE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
SAWYER v. NUTTER et al
as 4:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS SCOTT SAWYER
Defendant:
OFFICER NUTTER, BROWN, PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Karimu v. Thompson et al
as 3:2022cv00903
Plaintiff:
William Karimu
Defendant:
Jerry Thompson, Anthony Luckey, Travis Judy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYER v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv01984
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS L. MAYER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HARRIS v. SHEPHERD
as 1:2022cv01969
Plaintiff:
JARED A HARRIS
Defendant:
JACKSON SHEPHERD and TRAVIS DWIGHT HARBAUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARGER et al v. MAVERICK TRANSPORTATION, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01928
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS BARGER and SHERYL BARGER
Defendant:
MAVERICK TRANSPORTATION, LLC and TODD GROVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
TUTTLE v. STILLABOWER et al
as 1:2022cv01737
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS TUTTLE
Defendant:
TYLER STILLABOWER and CODY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
