Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Spivey v. Furlow et al
as 3:2010cv00689
Plaintiff:
William O Spivey
Defendant:
Sean Furlow, Phillips, Chaplain Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Peter Blatty v. Warner Bros Entertainment, Inc.
as 2:2010cv06611
Plaintiff:
William Peter Blatty
Defendant:
Warner Bros Entertainment, Inc.
Spivey v. Furlow et al
as 3:2010cv03222
Plaintiff:
William O Spivey
Defendant:
Sean Furlow, . Phillips, . Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AFL-AGC Building Trades Welfare and Pension Plan et al v. Iron Mountain Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00402
Plaintiff:
AFL-AGC Building Trades Welfare and Pension Plan , Andrew Joiner , Howard Guhne and others
Defendant:
Iron Mountain Construction, Inc., William Peters, Michael W. Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
New v. Uribe et al
as 3:2009cv02609
Petitioner:
William Peter New
Respondent:
Domingo Uribe, Jr. and The Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GE Business Financial Services Inc. v. Schiffman et al
as 1:2009cv04368
Plaintiff:
GE Business Financial Services Inc.
Defendant:
Alan T. Schiffman and William Peter Ridgeway Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
United States v. Patrick Peters
as 09-1747
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jessie Andrews and Darneice Johnson
Appellant:
Patrick William Peters
Patrick Peters v. Michael Timley, et al
as 09-1335
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Patrick William Peters
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Timley, State of Missouri, United States of America and others
PETERS et al v. MCNEIL
as 3:2008cv00551
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PETERS and SIDNEY MARTS
Defendant:
WALTER A MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PETERS v. HALLEY
as 3:2008cv00545
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PETERS
Defendant:
CHARLES HALLEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
