Cases 41 - 49 of 49
NICHOLAS v. DAUPHIN COUNTY COMMON PLEAS et al
as 1:2007cv00327
Plaintiff:
EDWARD J. NICHOLAS
Defendant:
DAUPHIN COUNTY COMMON PLEAS, LOWELL WITMER, CAROLYN THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
NICHOLAS v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 1:2007cv00324
Plaintiff:
EDWARD J. NICHOLAS
Defendant:
SEAN J. MCLAUGHLIN, LOWELL WITMER, SCOTT A. EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
NICHOLAS v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE RECORDS et al
as 1:2007cv00114
Plaintiff:
EDWARD J. NICHOLAS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE RECORDS, KELLAR, GEORGE ZOZOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
NICHOLAS v. EVANS et al
as 1:2007cv00113
Plaintiff:
EDWARD J. NICHOLAS
Defendant:
SCOTT A. EVANS, LOWELL WITMER and EDWARD MARISCO, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
NICHOLAS v. HEFFNER et al
as 1:2007cv00093
Petitioner:
EDWARD J. NICHOLAS
Respondent:
DONALD HEFFNER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF P.A, KELLAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
NICHOLAS v. STEWART et al
as 1:2007cv00084
Petitioner:
EDWARD J. NICHOLAS
Respondent:
MARSHA STEWART, KELLAR, LOWELL WITMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Witmer et al v. First Credit Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00777
Plaintiff:
Beverly Witmer and Roger E. Witmer, Jr.
Defendant:
First Credit Services, Inc., First Credit Services, Inc., Jay Alan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
NICHOLAS v. RENDELL et al
as 1:2007cv00081
Petitioner:
EDWARD J. NICHOLAS
Respondent:
RENDELL, COMMONWEALTH OF P.A., GEORGE ZOZOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholas v. Dauphin County Clerks Office et al
as 3:2007cv00228
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Nicholas
Defendant:
Dauphin County Clerks Office and Lowell Witmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
