Cases 41 - 50 of 114
Wooten v. USA
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2018cv00281
Petitioner:
Gerald Phillip Wooten
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sauls et al v. Marc Jones Construction, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00039
Plaintiff:
Buel Sauls and Elizabeth Sauls
Defendant:
Marc Jones Construction LLC and Todd Wooten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wooten v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2017cv03630
Plaintiff:
Bobby C Wooten
Defendant:
The State of Texas and Harris County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendives v. Wooten
as 5:2017cv01120
Plaintiff:
Roberto Carlos Mendives
Defendant:
Angela Wooten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wooten v. Harris County
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2017cv03135
Petitioner:
Bobby C Wooten
Defendant:
Harris County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wooten v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2017cv00118
Petitioner:
Christopher Wooten
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Aviles et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing to Policy No. AH58074 et al
as 3:2017cv00158
Plaintiff:
Erika Salas Aviles and Jose Nicolas Panduro
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing to Policy No. AH58074 , ACSI, Inc. and Clifton R. Wooten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wooten v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 4:2017cv00995
Plaintiff:
Irma Wooten
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wooten v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 1:2017cv00011
Petitioner:
Christopher Wooten
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wooten v. Parker et al
as 1:2017cv00012
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wooten
Defendant:
FNU Parker, FNU Yeats and Colleen Barton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.