Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Jones v. Watford-Mckinney et al
as 5:2011mc00057
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamont Jones
Defendant:
Yvonne V. Watford-Mckinney, Seth M. Wood, Matthew L. Fesak and others
Groah v. Keller et al
as 5:2011ct03103
Plaintiff:
Donald F. Groah
Defendant:
Alvin W. Keller, Jr., Paula Y. Smith, D. McLeod-Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mitchell v. Boner et al
as 3:2010cv00281
Plaintiff:
Danita Mitchell
Defendant:
Richard Boner, Calvin Murphy, Yvonne Mims-Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pryor et al v. Brown et al
as 5:2010cv00253
Plaintiff:
Larry Jean Pryor and Beverly Yvonne McKinney
Defendant:
Cornell Brown, John McCullen and Ollie Mae Browdy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
-PJG Stratton v. Mecklenburg County et al
as 3:2010cv00147
Plaintiff:
Jack Stratton
Defendant:
Mecklenburg County, Richard Jacobsen, Tyrone Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00345
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Webb et al v. A. W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2009cv00256
Plaintiff:
Ralph Herbert Webb and Yvonne E. Webb
Defendant:
A. W. Chesterton Company, Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DeWitt v. Lappin et al
as 5:2009ct03108
Plaintiff:
Curtis DeWitt
Defendant:
Harry Lappin, Newton E. Kendig, Yvonne Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Walker v. Lappin et al
as 5:2009ct03096
Plaintiff:
Eddie Joe Walker
Defendant:
Harry Lappin, Newton E. Kendig, Yvonne Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
