Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Thomas v. Allred et al
as 2:2012cv00227
Plaintiff:
James Earl Thomas
Defendant:
H Allred , Sandra Johnson, Leotis Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chappell et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2011cv03756
Plaintiff:
Anna Chappell , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roy v. Chappell et al
as 2:2011cv02534
Plaintiff:
Eddie Roy, Jr.
Defendant:
Agnes Chappell, Jeff Gillian, Sharon F Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chappell et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02404
Plaintiff:
Michelle L Chappell , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chappell v. Birmingham, Alabama, City Of
as 2:2011cv01315
Plaintiff:
Valinda Chappell
Defendant:
Birmingham, Alabama, City Of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chappell v. Chase Bank/Home Finance LLC et al (MAG+)
as 2:2010cv01026
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Chappell
Defendant:
Chase Bank/Home Finance LLC, Regions Bank, Compass Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor et al v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 2:2010cv01898
Plaintiff:
Denise Taylor , Burma Walters , Laura Boyles and others
Defendant:
Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP , Astrazeneca LP and Zeneca Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chappell v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2010cv00953
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Chappell
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
