Cases 41 - 50 of 242
Diarra v. Dekalb County Public Defender Office, Director et al
as 1:2021cv03293
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Defendant:
Dekalb County Public Defender Office, Director and Attorney Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TODD v. JARVIS et al
as 7:2021cv00103
Plaintiff:
MOUNTAVIUS ISAIAH TODD
Defendant:
J E JARVIS, SOUTHERN JUDICIAL CIRCUIT PUBLIC DEFENDERS and WADE KRUGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuten v. Public Defender's Office et al
as 4:2021cv00228
Plaintiff:
Nash N. Tuten
Defendant:
Public Defender's Office and Katilyn Beck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. ALLI et al
as 4:2021cv00129
Plaintiff:
NANCY B MILLER
Defendant:
OMOTAYO B ALLI, MOFFETT FLOURNOY, CHATTAHOOCHEE CIRCUIT PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. CLEVELAND et al
as 1:2021cv00110
Defendant:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL, DOUGHERTY COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE and RIAN CLEVELAND
Plaintiff:
NATERRIOUS CONNARD LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Diarra v. State Bar of Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv01969
Defendant:
Jane Doe, State Bar of Georgia and DeKalb Public Defender
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANADA v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2021cv00070
Defendant:
PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE OF MUSCOGEE COUNTY, MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL and MARK POST
Plaintiff:
ADAM J CANADA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. MELVENY et al
as 4:2021cv00059
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JACKSON
Defendant:
ROBERT O MELVENY and PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poole v. Northeast Judicial Circuit et al
as 2:2021cv00058
Plaintiff:
Edward Tyrone Poole
Defendant:
Larry Dottweiler, Hall County District Attorney's Office, Trey McConnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
